Kirana Megatara Tbk

$KMTR agak terlalu berharap sih, prospek kinerja bagus.. tp klo tidak ada yg menggerakan ya ngga bisa..

overall view masih bagus,
selama harga karet masih bagus produksi lancar ya tdk ada masalah..
q1 25 setidaknya kemungkinan masih positif..

hanya liquiditas pasar yg sangat kering disini

$KMTR knp g ada yg bahas ini ya @skydrugz27

Update Kinerja Emiten 12M24

$KMTR $AGRO $CBUT

Last price dan kurs USDIDR berdasarkan data tanggal 11 Maret 2025

Semoga bermanfaat

$KMTR gasss LK dah keluar saatnya merokett..

KMTR - PT. Kirana Megatara Tbk Rp 320 -8 (-2,00%) Info Selengkapnya! JAKARTA - PT Kirana Megatara Tbk (KMTR) menargetkan pertumbuhan pendapatan 28% menjadi Rp14,4 triliun pada 2025 dari tahun 2024 sebesar Rp11,25 triliun. Target tersebut disertai kenaikan unit penjualan (barang jadi karet, ...

KMTR - PT. Kirana Megatara Tbk Rp 328 -8 (-2,44%) Info Selengkapnya! JAKARTA - Laba bersih PT Kirana Megatara Tbk (KMTR) meroket 176,78% pada 2024 dibandingkan laba tahun 2023. Pertumbuhan kinerja laba ini disokong kenaikan pendapatan dan penurunan pada beban penjualan dan operasional.Dalam ...

$KMTR kok malah turun

$KMTR

$KMTR nunggu LK keluar kayaknya tapi kapan yaa..

$KMTR sekali 2 penurunan modal anak usaha

$KMTR wah kapan ya bisa manggung di atas 260..

$KMTR
Mentor sebut ini, ngikut.
Mentor kasih clue itu, ngikut.
Hajar terus guyss.

$KMTR cuma mau bilang, hati hati rugi selisih kurs😉

OOT :
CIA , RAND in Indonesia : Extracts IFLS data for sociopolitical and economic engineering ?

There is a historical connection between the RAND Corporation and the CIA, particularly during the Cold War when both organizations worked on overlapping interests, such as U.S. foreign policy, counterintelligence, and national security strategy. RAND's expertise in policy analysis and strategic planning made it a valuable resource for the CIA and other U.S. government agencies. Below is an explanation of their relationship and potential operations in Indonesia:


---

1. Relationship Between RAND and CIA

Shared Focus on U.S. National Security

During the Cold War, RAND provided research and analysis on military strategy, geopolitical threats, and counterinsurgency, which were critical to the CIA’s intelligence and covert operations.

RAND often developed strategies and recommendations that informed CIA operations, particularly in areas like counterinsurgency, counter-communism, and psychological warfare.


Staff and Consultant Overlap

There has historically been some personnel overlap between RAND and the CIA. Individuals affiliated with RAND have occasionally worked as consultants or analysts for the CIA. For example:

RAND researchers often provided strategic studies on areas of interest to the CIA, including Southeast Asia and the spread of communism.

Some former CIA operatives worked at RAND after leaving government service.



Cooperation on Counterinsurgency and Cold War Projects

RAND was heavily involved in developing counterinsurgency strategies, which aligned with CIA operations targeting communist movements worldwide.

The Vietnam War is a notable example where RAND’s work influenced CIA activities, particularly in advising on pacification programs and studying insurgencies.



---

2. RAND, CIA, and Operations in Indonesia

U.S. Interests in Indonesia

During the Cold War, Indonesia was a key focus for U.S. intelligence and policymaking due to its strategic location and the influence of communism within the country, especially the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI).

Both RAND and the CIA were involved in efforts to counter the spread of communism in Indonesia, particularly during the 1950s and 1960s.


CIA Operations in Indonesia

The CIA conducted several covert operations in Indonesia, including:

1958 Rebellion Support: The CIA backed regional rebellions against President Sukarno, fearing his alignment with communist nations. This operation, known as Operation Haik, involved providing weapons, funds, and logistical support to anti-Sukarno forces.

1965 Anti-Communist Purge: The CIA allegedly provided intelligence and support to the Indonesian military during the purge of the PKI after the failed 30 September Movement coup. This led to the mass killing of suspected communists, with estimates of casualties ranging from 500,000 to over a million.



RAND’s Role in Indonesia

RAND was not directly involved in covert operations like the CIA, but its research and analysis likely informed U.S. policy and CIA strategies in Indonesia. Examples include:

Conducting studies on Indonesian geopolitics, economic conditions, and social structures to inform U.S. policymakers.

Producing reports on communist insurgencies and counterinsurgency methods that influenced U.S. strategy in Southeast Asia, including Indonesia.



Focus on Counterinsurgency

RAND's work on counterinsurgency in the 1960s and 1970s contributed to broader U.S. efforts to support anti-communist regimes in Indonesia and elsewhere. This included advising on psychological warfare, economic aid programs, and political stabilization efforts.



---

3. Criticism and Ethical Concerns

Both RAND and the CIA have faced criticism for their roles in supporting U.S. policies and covert actions in Indonesia, especially those that resulted in human rights violations.

RAND’s indirect involvement, through research that may have been used to justify or guide CIA actions, has been scrutinized by scholars and activists.



---

4. Modern-Day Operations

Today, RAND’s work in Indonesia (if any) would likely focus on policy research rather than direct involvement in covert operations. For example, RAND might study issues like economic development, public health, or regional security in Indonesia, often commissioned by governments or international organizations.

The CIA’s operations in Indonesia today are less visible, but the agency likely continues to monitor the region due to its geopolitical importance, particularly in the context of U.S.-China competition.

---

Conclusion

The RAND Corporation and the CIA had overlapping interests during the Cold War, particularly in countering communism in Indonesia and Southeast Asia. RAND’s research on counterinsurgency and geopolitical strategy likely influenced CIA operations, including covert activities in Indonesia. While RAND was not directly involved in covert actions, its work contributed to the broader U.S. policy framework that guided CIA activities. Both organizations have faced criticism for their roles in Indonesia’s Cold War history, particularly regarding human rights and political interventions.


_______
The connections between RAND Corporation, the CIA, and the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) are worth exploring carefully. Here's an analysis of their potential relationships and activities in Indonesia, organized into distinct sections for clarity:


---

1. What is the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS)?

The Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) is a longitudinal survey managed by the RAND Corporation. It began in 1993 and collects detailed data on households, individuals, and communities in Indonesia. It focuses on areas like:

Health

Education

Employment and economic conditions

Family dynamics

Community infrastructure


The IFLS is widely recognized for its contributions to public policy, academic research, and developmental economics, as it provides insights into Indonesian living conditions and how policies affect its population.



---

2. RAND’s Role in IFLS

RAND is the lead institution behind the design and implementation of the IFLS. It collaborates with local Indonesian institutions such as:

Universities

Research centers

Field survey agencies


The IFLS is funded through academic grants and philanthropic contributions, particularly from international organizations like the World Bank or U.S. government agencies (e.g., USAID).



---

3. Potential CIA Involvement with RAND and IFLS

While there is no public evidence of direct CIA involvement in the IFLS, it’s important to understand the historical context:

RAND and CIA Connections

During the Cold War, RAND and the CIA often worked in tandem on geopolitical research, counterinsurgency, and intelligence gathering.

RAND's studies on Indonesia's population, economic conditions, and political dynamics during the Cold War were highly relevant to CIA operations, especially given Indonesia's pivotal role in the global struggle against communism.

It’s possible that RAND’s research, including data collected through projects like IFLS, indirectly informed broader U.S. strategies or intelligence activities.


CIA’s History in Indonesia

The CIA had extensive operations in Indonesia during the Cold War, including efforts to counter communism and influence political developments. The agency would have been interested in detailed socio-economic data about the country, which projects like the IFLS could indirectly provide.



---

4. The Role of IFLS Data

Data as a Policy Tool: IFLS data is publicly accessible and used by policymakers, academics, and international organizations to design and evaluate development programs in Indonesia. While its primary purpose is developmental, it’s conceivable that intelligence agencies like the CIA could analyze IFLS data to better understand Indonesian society.

No Evidence of Espionage: IFLS has consistently been framed as an academic and policy-oriented project. There is no direct evidence to suggest that it has been used for intelligence gathering or covert purposes.



---

5. Ethical Concerns and Perceptions

RAND’s Reputation in Indonesia

Some Indonesian scholars and activists may be skeptical of RAND’s involvement in projects like IFLS, given RAND’s historical association with U.S. military and intelligence operations.

These concerns stem from a broader distrust of foreign organizations collecting data in Indonesia, especially given the country’s history with Western interference during the Cold War.


Data Sovereignty Issues

Projects like IFLS raise questions about data sovereignty—who owns the data and how it might be used. While RAND states that IFLS is conducted for academic and developmental purposes, critics may worry about the potential for misuse by foreign governments or intelligence agencies.



---

6. Modern-Day Context

Today, the IFLS operates transparently and is widely regarded as a valuable resource for understanding Indonesian society. RAND’s role in the survey is focused on research and policy analysis rather than intelligence gathering.

The CIA’s activities in Indonesia today are less visible than during the Cold War, and there is no evidence of direct involvement with the IFLS.



---

Conclusion

The Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS), managed by the RAND Corporation, is a legitimate academic and policy-oriented project with no public evidence of direct CIA involvement. However, RAND's historical ties to the CIA and U.S. government agencies might raise questions about how data collected through projects like IFLS could be indirectly used to inform intelligence or policy strategies. While IFLS remains a respected and transparent initiative, issues of data sovereignty and historical context continue to influence perceptions of foreign-led research in Indonesia.

$KMTR $TAPG $ESSA

$KMTR gazzz ke utara ⛹️⛹️⛹️

$KMTR ⭐⭐

$KMTR ara ndaaar