Saham: BLOG - PT. Trimitra Trans Persada Tbk

Harganya makin lama makin turun, Kalau gk diem di tempat or tambah turun.
Transaksi harian jg gk sampe 200 jt, kacauu sih nihh.
Setuju c owner $BLOG bener2 rampok

Sang Owner dari $BLOG perampok, Ini harusnya BEI melakukan pemeriksaan saat Emitmen saham menjelang penerbitan IPO Saham, Jangan-jangan BEI di kasih pelicin deh makanya banyak yang lolos 🤔
masa Owner habis Meraup keuntungan langsung kabur entah kemana, gak peduli perkembangan sahamnya

$SMIL gw masuk 264. yuk minggu depan minim 290
$BAIK go$BLOG

UPDATE
untuk rekom ini kurang 3 emiten ya $RGAS $BLOG $SIDO. Semoga IHSG baik baik saja hehehe #DYOR

$BLOG Menderita KAka 😱🥶

$BLOG

$BLOG.

go$BLOG kali🤣

$BLOG bsa nanjakk kah ini

xl go$BLOG

$BLOG

Trading tanpa ilmu
Sering banget bikin zonk?
Belajar bareng disini…

https://cutt.ly/ItQ1i5VK

$LRNA
$BLOG
$IRSX

@Rrizki050601 dih sok tau go$BLOG

$BLOG sekarang ayam dan telur naik. Dan potensi dari MBG. Karena harus dari bahan yang SEGAR. Maka perlu jaringan gudang yang apa?. Dan lokasi gudang nya yg ekspansi itu daerah penghasil apa. Semoga bisa Cuan.

$BLOG

$BLOG mau DELISTING ya?

$BMRI $BBRI

$SMLE emit atau band yg $BLOG $TOOL

ayo naik $BLOG

Dari bacaan teman ngopi kemaren https://stockbit.com/post/28467541, ada satu istilah yang asing di telinga, yaitu 𝐬𝐥𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨.

Berikut bacaan teman ngopi lainnya yang menjelaskan terminologi tersebut, daripada Anda terjebak pom-pom 𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐒. Semoga bermanfaat!!!

Probably the most widely followed stat in baseball is batting average. It measures a player’s success rate for each at-bat. Whether they get a single or a home run, a hit is a successful at-bat.

The average batting average in Major League Baseball is .250. So the average player gets a hit one out of every four at-bats. The best baseball players hit a little better than a .300 batting average. A .400 average is the holy grail that hasn’t been achieved since Ted Williams did it in 1941.

Except, in baseball, not all hits are equal. And with such a low success rate, what the player does with each at-bat becomes important. That’s where slugging percentage comes in.

Slugging percentage measures a player’s ability to hit extra-base hits. A single is one base, a double is two bases, and so on. It measures the average bases earned per at-bat which you get by taking the total number of bases earned divided by total at-bats.

So if a player wants a high slugging percentage, they need to hit doubles or better fairly often. And a high slugging percentage tends to lead to scoring runs, which is how you win games.

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐨 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠?

Well, you might think the success rate (batting average) in investing is important. It seems logical that picking more winners is better. And it is.

But what matters more is how much money those winners make compared to how much the losers lose. In other words, your slugging percentage ultimately determines how successful you are at investing.

There is nothing wrong with trying for doubles and singles in investing. It’s the cost of missing while swinging for doubles and singles that matters.

Old school Ben Graham style strategies are the epitome of a low slugging percentage strategy that works so long as you keep price and valuation front of mind with every decision to limit costly losses. But it comes with the downside of needing to swing more often.

Index investing is another example of a low slugging percentage strategy that works. An index fund might pick a stock that goes up 10x or more but that stock’s overall impact on the average return for the winners in the fund is muted because of diversification. That’s not a bad thing either once you consider how difficult it is to find and hold on to stocks that go up 10x or more. The upside is that you only have to swing once on the index fund and the fund does the rest of the swinging for you.

On the other hand, strategies that chase a higher slugging percentage might make up for larger losses but likely deal with more frequent losses too. Venture capital is the epitome of a high slugging percentage strategy.

The average venture capital firm has a lower success rate than the average baseball player’s batting average. In fact, one or two enormous winners are all it takes to offset all the losers to make a venture capital firm successful. But to do that, you need to find the next Amazon or Google or Facebook at its inception.

Of course, there are ways to earn a higher slugging percentage without taking risks like a VC. Here are just a few:
*𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞. Great investments don’t grow 10x or more overnight. Even holding an investment that earns a modest annual return for years will naturally boost the average of your winners. A longer holding period also removes the problem of needing to find another winner that comes with selling too often.

*𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐤 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭. The lesson in slugging percentage is you’re bound to deal with losses. But limiting the average of your losses is one way to improve that number. The best way to do that is to avoid big losses that can really set you back.

*𝐏𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐢𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐠. It starts with properly sizing winners and losers but it includes adding to winners or potential winners. How this is done depends on the type of strategy. For instance value strategies often add to positions on declines, lowering the average cost basis, which boosts potential future returns.

*𝐓𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫/𝐑𝐞𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠. Investors often want to hang on to losers and sell winners but the old adage of cutting your losers and letting your winners run certainly applies to a high slugging percentage. From a broad portfolio perspective, applying strategic rebalancing rules that take advantage of corrections and crashes can boost potential future returns too.

*𝐁𝐞𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐫. The market rarely makes it easy to earn great returns. And it’s impossible to earn a high slugging percentage in investing if you’re scared out of great investments. So the ability to hold on, especially during rough patches, is key.

$NAIK $BLOG $MSTI

If a business does not generate attractive returns on the capital it already employs, adding more capital rarely fixes the problem. Most growth narratives fail this test surprisingly quickly.

Of course, there is an exception. Some businesses deliberately operate with depressed returns in the early stages of their expansion in order to build scale, density or infrastructure that will support structurally higher margins in the future.

This is common in platform models, logistics-heavy networks and certain consumer ecosystems. In these cases, short-term ROIC can look unattractive while long-term economics may still be compelling.

The problem is that this narrative is extremely easy to sell. Almost every low-return growth story claims that operating leverage, scale and future efficiency will eventually transform the business into a high-return compounder. But very few actually do.

The distinction between genuine scale-driven economics and permanent structural inefficiency is one of the hardest and most important judgments an investor has to make.

Investors should be especially skeptical when the improvement in returns depends primarily on optimistic assumptions about future margins, rather than on visible changes in cost structure, asset intensity or pricing power.

Growth is not the objective. Value creation is. When a business already earns high returns on capital, growth amplifies a good spread. It turns competitive advantage into compounding.

When a business earns poor returns on capital, growth only amplifies a bad spread. It scales inefficiency, not value. This is why the most dangerous words in investing are, “Returns will improve later.” Sometimes they do. Most of the time, they don’t.

And while growth stories may look impressive in earnings calls and investor decks, only one thing compounds your wealth over time. Reinvesting capital at returns meaningfully above its cost.

Everything else is just a bigger business. Not a more valuable one.

$TOTL $NAIK $BLOG

BLOG

Trimitra Trans Persada Tbk

402

-2

(-0.50%)

422,400

1.66 M

Company Background